2022
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2022.3146444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RCS Estimation of Drone Motion Using Mesh-Element Rotation in MoM and Micro-Doppler Signatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure highlights that the RCS calculation method proposed in this paper matches FEKO's results, indicating that this method can accurately calculate the RCS of target scatterers. The error is further quantified by Equation (10), where R represents the RCS value, subscripts A and B represent FEKO and the proposed method, respectively, and the L2-norm error resulting from the two methods of calculation is 3.7%. The error is slightly larger compared to the first two cases, which may be due to the fact that the FEKO calculation method in this model is based on the integral equation method.…”
Section: Validation Of Rcs Calculation In Free Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figure highlights that the RCS calculation method proposed in this paper matches FEKO's results, indicating that this method can accurately calculate the RCS of target scatterers. The error is further quantified by Equation (10), where R represents the RCS value, subscripts A and B represent FEKO and the proposed method, respectively, and the L2-norm error resulting from the two methods of calculation is 3.7%. The error is slightly larger compared to the first two cases, which may be due to the fact that the FEKO calculation method in this model is based on the integral equation method.…”
Section: Validation Of Rcs Calculation In Free Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucente et al (2008) utilized an iteration-free MOM approach to solve large multiscale electromagnetic scattering problems [9]. Lee et al (2022) used MOM to quickly estimate the dynamic RCS of a drone in various motions [10]. Differential methods generally require boundary conditions to truncate open spaces and can theoretically handle various shapes and parameterized media situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, time-domain methods mainly include clutter simulation methods based on statistical models [8], backscatter simulation methods based on measured SAR images, and SAR image simulation methods based on digital elevation models (DEMs) [9,10], which are mainly aimed at simulating large-scene SAR images and have the advantage of low algorithm complexity. Frequency-domain methods mainly include finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) [11][12][13], method of moments (MOM) [14][15][16], physical optics (PO), geometric optics (GO), and SBR methods [17][18][19]. These methods calculate the frequency-domain response of the target to obtain the SAR image and have the characteristics of high algorithm complexity and high calculation accuracy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to analyze the dynamic electromagnetic scattering characteristics of the tilt-rotor aircraft in multiple modes by only relying on the basic QSP because the aircraft can simultaneously tilt the nacelles at low speed and rotate the two rotors at high speed with opposite rotation directions [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a method of dynamic time-varying mesh that can accurately characterize the shape of the tilt-rotor aircraft at any moment, so as to clearly simulate the dynamic process [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%