2015
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-analysis of health and educational impacts of a school-based deworming programme in western Kenya: a pure replication

Abstract: Background: Helminth (worm) infections cause morbidity among poor communities worldwide. An influential study conducted in Kenya in 1998–99 reported that a school-based drug-and-educational intervention had benefits regarding worm infections and school attendance. Effects were seen among children treated with deworming drugs, untreated children in intervention schools and children in nearby non-intervention schools. Combining these effects, the intervention was reported to increase school attendance by 7.5% in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

5
124
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
124
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Miguel and Kremer (2004) made two key claims: 1) deworming creates positive epidemiological externalities, thus causing estimates of the impact of deworming based on individual randomization to be biased downwards; and 2) deworming increases school participation. The results in Aiken et al (2014) are consistent with these findings. In addition to direct impacts of deworming treatment on worm infections, Aiken et al (2014) find externality effects within schools on untreated pupils, as well as externality effects across schools up to 3 km away.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Miguel and Kremer (2004) made two key claims: 1) deworming creates positive epidemiological externalities, thus causing estimates of the impact of deworming based on individual randomization to be biased downwards; and 2) deworming increases school participation. The results in Aiken et al (2014) are consistent with these findings. In addition to direct impacts of deworming treatment on worm infections, Aiken et al (2014) find externality effects within schools on untreated pupils, as well as externality effects across schools up to 3 km away.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The externality effect on moderate-to-heavy worm infections from treated pupils attending schools 3-6 km away was statistically significant in the original Miguel and Kremer (2004) analysis, but is not significant in the updated analysis in Aiken et al (2014). The point estimate on the 3-6 km externality term in the school participation analysis was negative but not statistically significant in the original Miguel and Kremer (2004) analysis, and remains so in the updated analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations