Materialitas 2009
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1cfr97n.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Collected Objects:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooney (2010) and O’Connor (2010) remind us that dismissive archaeological attitudes to ‘mundane’ stone risk misunderstanding its social and cultural significance. Local stone that is part of daily life can be just as meaning laden and have as much semiotic potential as other more ‘attractive’ (larger, exotic) material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cooney (2010) and O’Connor (2010) remind us that dismissive archaeological attitudes to ‘mundane’ stone risk misunderstanding its social and cultural significance. Local stone that is part of daily life can be just as meaning laden and have as much semiotic potential as other more ‘attractive’ (larger, exotic) material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixes of ‘natural’ and ‘cultural’ sarsen speak to the material’s social significance. O’Connor (2010) questions the line drawn between ‘artefactual’ and ‘natural’ stone, drawing attention to significant meanings afforded to unworked stone in numerous settings. The hybridity expressed in archaeological contexts such as Neolithic pits containing worked and unworked sarsen appears also above ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%