2018
DOI: 10.3998/mfr.4919087.0021.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Re)Conceptualizing Families: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, family sociologists would likely agree that there is no one correct way to define family (Haskin, 2018; Trost, 1988). Family relations may be biological or legal or neither as more have “chosen” family members (Naples, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, family sociologists would likely agree that there is no one correct way to define family (Haskin, 2018; Trost, 1988). Family relations may be biological or legal or neither as more have “chosen” family members (Naples, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family relations may be biological or legal or neither as more have “chosen” family members (Naples, 2001). However, many continue to default to stereotypical thinking when it comes to what constitutes family and rely on popular images of a nuclear family with a married mom and dad and children (DaCosta, 2007; Haskin, 2018; Naples, 2001). Furthermore, we continue to conceptualize that a nuclear “normative family is still monoracial” (DaCosta, 2007, p. 175).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%