2005
DOI: 10.1080/13572330500158656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-election and political career paths in the Uruguayan Congress, 1985–99

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5 0.0137). This finding is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that senior incumbents are re-elected time after time (Altman and Chasquetti 2005;Cain et al 1987;Cunningham 1971;Erikson 1972;Heitshusen et al 2005;Krashinsky and Milne 1986). We did not find any significant difference in the productivity of junior and senior members of the Knesset.…”
Section: Government and Oppositionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…5 0.0137). This finding is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that senior incumbents are re-elected time after time (Altman and Chasquetti 2005;Cain et al 1987;Cunningham 1971;Erikson 1972;Heitshusen et al 2005;Krashinsky and Milne 1986). We did not find any significant difference in the productivity of junior and senior members of the Knesset.…”
Section: Government and Oppositionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…However, in recent decades, several institutional and political events (constitutional reform, decentralization, and temporal detachment of federal and subnational elections) affected the incentives that political actors face in making their career decisions. Even though the rates of reelection seekers have remained quite stable since the nineties (Altman and Chasquetti ), subnational executive posts ( intendentes at the Department level, synonyms of state governors) became increasingly attractive public offices, creating opportunities and benefits for a new kind of career path: progressively ambitious legislators. The interesting question that comes out here is what the behavioral implications of increased subnational ambition are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These collective institutions of government arose in different institutional settings and had to get along with different types of legislatures. While the Swiss legislature is a non-standing body with a militia structure featuring unprofessional and unpaid legislators who seldom meet for congressional sessions (Kobach 1993), in Uruguay the legislature is a professional body, maybe one of the strongest in Latin America, and has important tools for controlling the Executive (Altman and Chasquetti 2005). Of course, the nature of the relationship between the executive and legislative powers lies at the core of the regime discussion.…”
Section: Executive Collegiatementioning
confidence: 99%