Re-Embedding Liberalism:

Streinz, Thomas

doi:10.2307/j.ctvk8w1rz.26

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…352-353;with examples include: studies that briefly discuss the difficulties of including data protection in trade agreements; 29 studies addressing regulatory cooperation for the protection of personal data in trade agreements; 30 and studies that focus on the different positions during the negotiations of the so-called "mega-regional trade agreements" such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) or the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). 31 Yet, there has been no analysis of the legal requirements for data flow clauses included in EU trade agreements and there have been no alternative suggestions for the design of such clauses. In addition, the EU horizontal model data flow clauses, which the European Commission endorsed in 2018, have not been the subject of much scientific debate either.…”

Section: Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Naef

2022

European Yearbook of International Economic Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data protection is an area where fundamental rights collide with trade policy. Personal data has become an essential asset for the digital economy. Consequently, the free flow of personal data across borders has been described as a “new battleground” for states trying to protect their vital economic and non-economic interests—especially now that trade negotiations are shifting to digital trade. There is a deep disagreement about when data protection should be considered data protectionism. This research explores EU-style data protection and shows where the line between data protection and data protectionism in international trade law currently is, and how it can, or should be redrawn.

show abstract

Section: Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%