2021
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re‐emphasizing mechanism in the community ecology of disease

Abstract: This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(127 reference statements)
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of the snail, the body size of immediate neighbors is also critically important for transmission: small snails had lower prevalence of schistosomes when in populations with a greater proportion of large conspecifics. This observation supports the hypothesis that individuals with relatively high exposure rates to parasites can shield their conspecifics from infection, a form of transmission interference akin to the much-discussed dilution effect that is typically considered in multispecies host communities (Keesing et al 2006;Shaw & Civitello 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the perspective of the snail, the body size of immediate neighbors is also critically important for transmission: small snails had lower prevalence of schistosomes when in populations with a greater proportion of large conspecifics. This observation supports the hypothesis that individuals with relatively high exposure rates to parasites can shield their conspecifics from infection, a form of transmission interference akin to the much-discussed dilution effect that is typically considered in multispecies host communities (Keesing et al 2006;Shaw & Civitello 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This observation supports the hypothesis that individuals with relatively high exposure rates to parasites can shield their conspecifics from infection, a form of transmission interference akin to the much-discussed dilution effect that is typically considered in multi-species host communities (Keesing et al . 2006; Shaw & Civitello 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That non-host consumers could reduce parasite transmission was identified early on as a key consequence stemming from this type of biotic interference (e.g. Rowan, 1958; reviews by Thieltges et al , 2008b, 2013; Johnson et al , 2010) and the general ability of predators to affect infectious disease dynamics has now been broadly recognized and documented (see reviews by Lopez & Duffy, 2021; Shaw & Civitello, 2021). The use of non-host predators for biocontrol thus holds much potential as a strategy to manage certain infectious diseases (Burge et al , 2016; Lopez & Duffy, 2021; Shaw & Civitello, 2021).…”
Section: Community-level Implications Of Cercariae Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced transmission is a major potential consequence of cercariae removal from the environment and there has been substantial interest in using cercariae consumers as a form of biocontrol (Lopez & Duffy, 2021; Shaw & Civitello, 2021). This said, most reports of cercariae consumption do not investigate whether this affected transmission to downstream hosts.…”
Section: Gaps In Knowledge and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation