2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03365-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Engagement into HIV Care: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent meta-analyses of outcomes for persons with HIV (PLH) in the United States who are out-of-care [1] indicate both the progress made and the challenges that remain in designing and broadly implementing interventions for PLH. In contrast to two earlier review articles on this topic [2,3], this meta-analysis found significant benefits of five different HIV-related interventions: patient navigation, appointment alerts; transportation and appointment coordination; social support, and data-to-care (i.e. using a surveillance system to inform providers when a PLH has dropped out-of-care).…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The most recent meta-analyses of outcomes for persons with HIV (PLH) in the United States who are out-of-care [1] indicate both the progress made and the challenges that remain in designing and broadly implementing interventions for PLH. In contrast to two earlier review articles on this topic [2,3], this meta-analysis found significant benefits of five different HIV-related interventions: patient navigation, appointment alerts; transportation and appointment coordination; social support, and data-to-care (i.e. using a surveillance system to inform providers when a PLH has dropped out-of-care).…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Of the studies that examined retention in HIV care, outcome measures were highly diverse and characterized by four categories: changes in clinic visits, laboratory tests, ART use, and HIV viral load suppression. Therefore, there is a need for consistent health care utilization metrics and definitions across interventions as part of the larger goal to end the HIV epidemic [ 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligibility criteria were intervention studies conducted in the U.S., included comparisons between groups or prepost, published between 2000 and 2020, tested interventions for helping care engagement of OOC PWH, and reported one of the following outcomes: reengagement in care, retention in care, and viral suppression. As noted in the previous qualitative systematic reviews [23,24], there was substantial heterogeneity in definitions of outcomes and OOC populations in the literature. For comprehensiveness, we accepted author definitions.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because RCTs may be impractical to implement in real world settings, alternate innovative methods such as constructing a comparison group from surveillance data or using a stepped-wedge design are worth considering [16,45]. Working toward a common definition of OOC and standardized HIV care outcome measurements [23,24,71] and thresholds for clinical significance that are meaningful from a public health perspective would further facilitate evaluation and research synthesis of the re-engagement literature. Similarly, establishing a standard for re-engagement that parallels the national indicator for linkage to care for persons who are newly diagnosed may help with evaluating re-engagement programs.…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation