2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the influence of other factors, for example gender, was not as clearly identifiable as a risk factor for problems with placement. Our findings were similar to other reviews in the area (Kimberlin et al, 2009) which concluded that these same child characteristics could affect placement outcome and rates of re-entry to care after reunification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on the influence of other factors, for example gender, was not as clearly identifiable as a risk factor for problems with placement. Our findings were similar to other reviews in the area (Kimberlin et al, 2009) which concluded that these same child characteristics could affect placement outcome and rates of re-entry to care after reunification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, they also noted that parental behaviour seemed to moderate the relationship between child behaviour and placement breakdown. Kimberlin et al (2009) conducted a review examining the factors that result in re-entry to care. They found the child characteristics of health problems, mental health problems, behaviour problems, infant or pre-teen/teenage all to be risk factors that correlate to re-entry to care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the risk factors associated with recurrence and re-entry are not modifiable (age, race, maltreatment type) or are difficult to address in the near term (parent mental health, education, income) and are therefore outside the control of the child welfare system (Hindley, Ramchandani, & Jones, 2006; Kimberlin, Anthony, & Austin, 2009). However, parenting and relationship quality constitute modifiable factors well within child welfare’s purview and purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnicity is also a factor, as recent data suggest that in some communities, African American children are less likely to be reunified than white children (Connell et al 2006), and experience slower times to reunification when it does occur (Harris and Courtney 2003;Wells and Guo 1999) (see Wulczyn 2011 for data on county variability in racial disparity). Finally, children in group care settings are less likely to reunify (Wells and Correia 2010) and have an increased likelihood of re-entry into care, as do youth with emotional and behavior disorders (see Kimberlin et al 2009, for a review).…”
Section: Reunification and Re-entry Ratesmentioning
confidence: 98%