Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2018
DOI: 10.17169/fqs-19.3.3153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Envisioning Member Checking and Communicating Results as Accountability Practice in Qualitative Research: A South African Community-Based Organization Example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, I made my analysis of participants' interviews vulnerable to critique. This was in line with my ethical commitments to informed consent, accountability and care towards my participants (Naidu & Prose, 2018). In light of the deeply personal nature of the interviews, I felt it was particularly important to allow participants to review what I had written about them.…”
Section: Sharing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this way, I made my analysis of participants' interviews vulnerable to critique. This was in line with my ethical commitments to informed consent, accountability and care towards my participants (Naidu & Prose, 2018). In light of the deeply personal nature of the interviews, I felt it was particularly important to allow participants to review what I had written about them.…”
Section: Sharing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While the intent of these studies seemed to lean towards critical qualitative scholarship that stands for equity and would be transformative [49], the question of the communication of the research findings to the communities involved was given little critical attention. Although knowledge dissemination strategies are increasingly required by funders, accountability should perhaps extend beyond the publication of research findings to proactive "taking-it-back" events in the communities from which the data was gathered as a mark of respect for the research participants [50]. This would enhance the building of partnerships with the researched communities, congruent with the ethos of Agenda 2030.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found the reader’s theatre method effective in sharing research findings with participants. Naidu and Prose (2018) argue that “returning study findings to communities” is not simply a validity checking practice, but it is an accountability practice driven by an ethnical imperative of community-based research. In our research, the method helped to foster an opportunity where research participants could evaluate the authenticity and relatability of the scripts and benefit from research outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%