Re-Evaluating the Returns to Language Skills Using Latent Trait Estimates

Abstract

R® is a registered trademark Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Re-Evaluating the Returns to Language Skills Using Latent Trait EstimatesJames Marrone * RAND CorporationOctober 9, 2017 AbstractPast studies have established a sizable wage premium for immigrants who learn the language of their destination country. However, these measurements are usually based on self-reported ordinal measures of spoken language fluency, which are problematic and inconsistent in several ways. Using detailed survey data from United States and France, this paper constructs more robust latent trait measures of language fluency using well-established psychometric methods, and re-evaluates the evidence for the wage premium. The results show that measures of spoken fluency alone conflate those with and without non-verbal skills (reading, writing, and comprehending) and therefore overestimate the wage premium for speaking. I find that the additional wage premium attributable to full verbal/nonverbal fluency is as large as that for verbal fluency alone. In addition, I provide evidence that the skills separating verbalonly from full fluency are generally related to education and training before immigration rather than to skills acquired after. Finally, I show that systematic differences in survey response between demographic groups are not a major source of measurement bias.