2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluating the sensitivity of the rabbit infectivity test for Treponema pallidum in modern era

Abstract: In conclusions, RIT is no longer a highly sensitive method for detecting T. pallidum in clinical samples as before, and is not inadequately considered to be a reference method for measuring the sensitivity of other new methods, such as the PCR. These data represent the first reexamination of the sensitivity of RIT in the post-antibiotic era with a large clinical sample.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the rabbit that was injected with CDC-SF007, which successfully grew in vivo, did not show any discernible orchitis even when seroreactive and PCR+, while the rabbit with CDC-SF003 developed orchitis beginning in week 6 when an increase in antibody titers was first noted. Consistent with previous studies [9,26,61,64,65], these observations indicate that including additional detection methods for treponemal propagation in rabbits can avoid overlooking an active infection that could inadvertently be cleared by the immune response before treponemal harvest can be performed. Of note, when comparing serology and PCR, both methods generally showed a reactive or positive result at comparable time points post infection for a given rabbit, which aligns with a previous study [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, the rabbit that was injected with CDC-SF007, which successfully grew in vivo, did not show any discernible orchitis even when seroreactive and PCR+, while the rabbit with CDC-SF003 developed orchitis beginning in week 6 when an increase in antibody titers was first noted. Consistent with previous studies [9,26,61,64,65], these observations indicate that including additional detection methods for treponemal propagation in rabbits can avoid overlooking an active infection that could inadvertently be cleared by the immune response before treponemal harvest can be performed. Of note, when comparing serology and PCR, both methods generally showed a reactive or positive result at comparable time points post infection for a given rabbit, which aligns with a previous study [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The T. pallidum Nichols strain was kindly provided by Lorenzo Giacani, Ph.D. (University of Washington, Seattle) and was propagated via intra-testicular serial passage in New Zealand white rabbits to maintain virulence in our laboratory as previously described [ 12 ]. Forty-five male New Zealand white rabbits (purchased from the Xiamen University Laboratory Animal Center, weighing approximately three kilograms each) with negative results in both the reactive rapid plasma reagin and T. pallidum particle agglutination tests, were randomly assigned to two groups, a blank group ( n = 15) and an infection group ( n = 30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information can provide a fresh perspective to help researchers address the current challenges. the sensitivity of rabbit infectivity test in current post-antibiotic era is no longer highly sensitive, 8 and high false-positive or falsenegative result of microscopy test usually occurs when laboratory workers lack experiences to distinguish T. pallidum from commensal treponemas. All these factors make pathogenic detection arduous in extensive clinical application.…”
Section: Conventional Detection Of Syphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been recognized as the gold standard in syphilis diagnosis. However, T. pallidum still encounter difficulties in extra‐corporal cultivation even though a new article expounded T. pallidum can be co‐incubated in rabbit epithelial cell for 180 days; the sensitivity of rabbit infectivity test in current post‐antibiotic era is no longer highly sensitive, and high false‐positive or false‐negative result of microscopy test usually occurs when laboratory workers lack experiences to distinguish T. pallidum from commensal treponemas . All these factors make pathogenic detection arduous in extensive clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%