2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-02768-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluation of HER2 status in 606 breast cancers—gene protein assay on tissue microarrays versus routine pathological assessment

Abstract: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is routinely determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) performed on whole tissue sections (WS). The purpose was to evaluate whether a gene protein assay (GPA) combining IHC with ISH, performed on breast cancer tissue microarray (TMA), is suitable for largescale retrospective HER2 status evaluation. TMAs from 606 tumours from a Swedish population-based cohort (2005-2012) were stained with GPA. GPA IHC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the pathology reports lacked data on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification, HER2 status was obtained from dual gene protein staining of HER2 on TMAs from the patients’ tumors. This method showed an agreement of 97.7% with available pathological assessment ( 24 ). The patients were followed up until June 30, 2019.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…If the pathology reports lacked data on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification, HER2 status was obtained from dual gene protein staining of HER2 on TMAs from the patients’ tumors. This method showed an agreement of 97.7% with available pathological assessment ( 24 ). The patients were followed up until June 30, 2019.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Prognostic associations for AhR became stronger when HER2 was included in the multivariable models (data not shown). However, HER2 status was more often missing from small tumors with longer follow-up times ( 36 ) and inclusion of this marker could bias the analyses. Therefore, HER2 status was not used in the multivariable analyses presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HER2 status (amplified/non-amplified) was incorporated into a clinical routine in November 2005 and was available for most tumors after that date. Clinical HER2 status was supplemented with retrospective HER2 analysis by gene protein assay on tissue microarrays (TMA) ( 36 ). Information on histological type and grade, invasive tumor size, and axillary node involvement (ALNI) was retrieved from the patient charts and pathology reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical HER2 status was supplemented with HER2 status obtained by retrospective HER2 analysis with gene protein assay using tissue microarrays (TMA) for 269 patients. The agreement in HER2 status between the pathological assessment using whole slides and TMA was 97.7% ( 28 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%