1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00204-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examination of the effect of a plane boundary on force and vortex shedding of a circular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
171
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
26
171
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As concerns the influence of the boundary layer, Zdravkovich 11 reported that the rapid decrease in drag occurred as the gap was reduced to less than the thickness of the boundary layer, ␦ B , on a fixed ground, and concluded that the variation of the drag coefficient was dominated by h / ␦ B rather than by the conventional gap ratio h / d. However, Hiwada et al 12 reported, for the case of ␦ B / d = 0.23, that the decrease in drag started around h / d = 0.5, at which the cylinder was still outside the thin wall boundary layer and the regular vortex shedding was still observed. A further investigation was conducted for a wider range of ␦ B / d by Lei et al, 13 but no clear relation was observed between ␦ B , ͑h / d͒ c and the gap at which the decrease in drag occurred in their measurements. More recently, Zdravkovich 14 measured the drag on a circular cylinder placed near a moving ground at a higher Reynolds number of 2.5ϫ 10, 5 and reported that, in contrast to all the above investigations, the decrease in drag due to the decrease in h / d did not occur.…”
Section: ͔ Bearman and Zdravkovichmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As concerns the influence of the boundary layer, Zdravkovich 11 reported that the rapid decrease in drag occurred as the gap was reduced to less than the thickness of the boundary layer, ␦ B , on a fixed ground, and concluded that the variation of the drag coefficient was dominated by h / ␦ B rather than by the conventional gap ratio h / d. However, Hiwada et al 12 reported, for the case of ␦ B / d = 0.23, that the decrease in drag started around h / d = 0.5, at which the cylinder was still outside the thin wall boundary layer and the regular vortex shedding was still observed. A further investigation was conducted for a wider range of ␦ B / d by Lei et al, 13 but no clear relation was observed between ␦ B , ͑h / d͒ c and the gap at which the decrease in drag occurred in their measurements. More recently, Zdravkovich 14 measured the drag on a circular cylinder placed near a moving ground at a higher Reynolds number of 2.5ϫ 10, 5 and reported that, in contrast to all the above investigations, the decrease in drag due to the decrease in h / d did not occur.…”
Section: ͔ Bearman and Zdravkovichmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When water must pass through a constricted opening (the gap), the velocity increases and the pressure decreases; the decreased pressure under the piece causes a downward force. Gap lift coefficients can be estimated from Lei et al [1999] as…”
Section: Interactions With the Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10. /j.jfluidstructs.2007 The flow around a circular cylinder placed near and parallel to a ground has been experimentally investigated by Bearman and Zdravkovich (1978), Zdravkovich (1985), Lei et al (1999), and the present authors , among others [see for a more extensive review]. The characteristics of the flow and force acting on the cylinder in this case are governed not only by the Reynolds number Re but also by the gap ratio, i.e., the ratio of the distance between the cylinder and the ground, h, to the cylinder diameter d (Bearman and Zdravkovich, 1978).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the flow and force acting on the cylinder in this case are governed not only by the Reynolds number Re but also by the gap ratio, i.e., the ratio of the distance between the cylinder and the ground, h, to the cylinder diameter d (Bearman and Zdravkovich, 1978). However, the mechanisms of the flow and force variations caused by different h/d, or 'ground effect', are in general rather complicated since they can be significantly affected by the state of the boundary layer formed on the ground (Zdravkovich, 1985;Lei et al, 1999). Hence the present authors recently carried out a series of experiments on a circular cylinder placed near a moving ground running at the same speed as the free-stream (Re ¼ 0.4 and 1.0 Â 10 5 based on the cylinder diameter d) to avoid the confusing effects of the boundary layer and thereby to elucidate the essence of the ground effect .…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%