2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2015.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examination of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) immune response to flagellin: Yersinia ruckeri flagellin is a potent activator of acute phase proteins, anti-microbial peptides and pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro

Abstract: Flagellin is the principal component of bacterial flagellum and a major target of the host immune system. To provide new insights into the role of flagellin in fish immune responses to flagellated microorganisms, a recombinant flagellin from Yersinia ruckeri (rYRF) was produced and its bioactivity investigated in the trout macrophage cell line RTS-11 and head kidney cells. rYRF is a potent activator of pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute phase proteins, antimicrobial peptides and subunits of the IL-12 cytokine f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CATH-2 is a potent AMP in salmonids, able to kill a range of fish bacterial pathogens as part of the innate immune response [55]. It has been reported to be upregulated by IL-6 and flagellin (YRF) in a trout macrophage (RTS-11) cell line [29,26], in keeping with the present findings. However, the effects of rIL-6 on CATH-2 expression were quite marginal, and indeed both pro-inflammatory cytokines tested (rIL-1β and rIL-6) induced relatively few/small effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CATH-2 is a potent AMP in salmonids, able to kill a range of fish bacterial pathogens as part of the innate immune response [55]. It has been reported to be upregulated by IL-6 and flagellin (YRF) in a trout macrophage (RTS-11) cell line [29,26], in keeping with the present findings. However, the effects of rIL-6 on CATH-2 expression were quite marginal, and indeed both pro-inflammatory cytokines tested (rIL-1β and rIL-6) induced relatively few/small effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Purified Atlantic salmon GALT leucocytes obtained using protocol-3, were suspended in RPMI-1640 containing P/S and 10% FBS, then plated at 2x10 6 cells /well into 12 well plates and cultured at 20 o C. The cells, from individual fish, were then stimulated with 10 μg /ml phytohaemagglutinin from Phaseolus vulgaris (PHA, Sigma), 50 μg /ml LPS, 100 μg /ml polyinosinic acid: polycytidylic acid (poly I:C, Sigma), 100 ng /ml recombinant flagellin from Yersinia ruckeri (rYRF, [26], 25 ng /ml IL-1β1 [27], 100 ng /ml IL-2B [28], 100 ng /ml IL-6 [29], 200 ng /ml IL-21 [30] and 20 ng /ml IFN-α2/IFN2 [31]. All doses used were previously shown to be optimal for trout and Atlantic salmon cells [32,33,34], and the cytokine paralogues chosen have known bioactivity on leucocytes from other tissues.…”
Section: Atlantic Salmon Galt Leucocyte Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of a set of genes for acute phase proteins (APPs), antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and cytokines using real time PCR were performed as described previously [25,[32][33]. Briefly, the PCR amplification was performed using a LightCycler® 480 Instrument II (Roche Applied Science) and 384 multiwell plates in a µl reaction using SYBR® Green I (Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, USA) and IMMOLASE ™ DNA Polymerase (Bioline, UK), and expression levels calculated using the 'LightCycler® 480 software version 1.5.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysis By Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest differences were seen when one of the paralogues was responsive and the other not, as with IL-1β1 and 2 vs IL-1β3, IL-4/13A vs IL-4/13B1 and 2, IL-10A vs IL-10B, IL-12 p40B2 vs p40B1 and p40C, IL-17A/F1A vs IL-17A/F1B, IL-17A/F2A vs IL-17A/F2B, and SAP1 vs SAP2. Differential responses of paralogues have been seen in responses to PAMPs [22,33], infection [24,26] and cytokine stimulation [25][26]. These differences likely reflect differences in the promoters, with some of the paralogues becoming more or less responsive to particular signalling pathways, perhaps in particular cell types, or genes that are being pseudogenised.…”
Section: Differential Expression Of Paralogous Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following transformation of the plasmid into BL21 Star (DE3) competent cells (Invitrogen) and the induction of recombinant protein production, a first purification was performed under denaturing conditions. Successively we undertook a refolding process, a re-purification under native conditions, a SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified proteins and a quantification of the protein concentration as described in detail previously 4547 . The refolding buffer contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 0.5 M arginine monohydrochloride, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%