2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examining prominent measures of divergent and convergent creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We replicate the previous literature and extend the finding to the novel TriBond and LocBond tasks. To date, there has been discussion about the nature of crystallized and fluid intelligence in creativity, and compound remote associates by proxy (Benedek & Fink, 2019;Cortes, Weinberger, Daker, & Green, 2019;Marko, Michalko, Riecansky, 2018;Kim, 2005;Silvia, 2015). Replicating Lee and Therriault (2013) we find a positive relation between measures of intelligence and problem solving ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We replicate the previous literature and extend the finding to the novel TriBond and LocBond tasks. To date, there has been discussion about the nature of crystallized and fluid intelligence in creativity, and compound remote associates by proxy (Benedek & Fink, 2019;Cortes, Weinberger, Daker, & Green, 2019;Marko, Michalko, Riecansky, 2018;Kim, 2005;Silvia, 2015). Replicating Lee and Therriault (2013) we find a positive relation between measures of intelligence and problem solving ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Recently, there have been calls for more research focused on fundamental processes and abilities related to creativity and multiply-constrained problem solving (Benedek, Konen, & Neubauer, 2012;Benedek & Fink, 2019;Cortes, Weinberger, Daker, & Green, 2019;Dietrich, 2018). Currently, the predominant theory is that working memory and associated attention and inhibitory processes are the most likely predictors of problem solving ability (see .…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may be unsurprising given that the CRAT is a measure of convergent, as opposed to divergent thinking, and does not largely involve sematic relations (see Cortes, Weinberger, Daker, & Green, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of our study concerns the measures of creativity used. Interpretations made on GAU scores representing divergent creativity and RAT scores representing convergent creativity should be considered with caution as these measures are not completely independent and pure (Patterson, Frith & Loprinzi, 2018;Cortes, Weinberger, Daker & Green, 2019). In order to remove doubts about the measures, further studies involving several different types of divergence and convergence oriented tasks should be carried out in order to have a better understanding of the effects involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%