2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10663-015-9312-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-examining the real interest rate parity hypothesis (RIPH) using panel unit root tests with asymmetry and cross-section dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, energy use appears as the second most important factor. These findings are in line with those reported previously [ 44 47 ]. However, energy consumption and economic growth negatively influence the environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, energy use appears as the second most important factor. These findings are in line with those reported previously [ 44 47 ]. However, energy consumption and economic growth negatively influence the environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…To experimentally evaluate whether the macroeconomic variables are stationary, five nonlinear unit root tests are applied. We used (FFFFF) [ 43 ], (CEO) [ 44 ], (OSHa) [ 45 ], (OY) [ 46 ], and (OEHa) [ 47 ] tests. The source of nonlinearity of the employed unit root tests has been identified as a time-dependent nonlinearity, as well as a combination of the time-dependent nonlinearity and a state-dependent nonlinearity, which may be referred to as a hybrid form of nonlinearity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other unit root test for structural break is the CEO 4 test. Corakci. et al (2017) consider Equations ( 2a)-(2c) by using the exponential transition function, based on a sample size T as follows:…”
Section: The Other Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), Chang and Su (), and Corakci et al . () used different panel unit root tests and again, supported the parity hypothesis across most pairs of countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%