2006
DOI: 10.1177/1532708605285622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re/Forming the Anorexic “Prisoner”: Inpatient Medical Treatment as the Return to Panoptic Femininity

Abstract: Through a theoretical and discursive text analysis, medical protocols for the inpatient treatment of anorexia nervosa are exposed as part of a disciplinary regime that enforces women's embodied conformity to normative femininity. Although anorectic practices are read as a threat to the patriarchal social apparatus because they represent women's autonomous manipulation of their bodies, medical protocols are read as a means of returning the female body to masculinist control. From a Foucauldian and feminist pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar ethnographic study as a participant observer in an inpatient unit, Gremillion (2003) wondered ‘whether the (frequently reported) anorexic experiences of isolation and competitiveness are amplified in this treatment setting’ (p. 20) and she suggested that ‘the system itself could play into illness chronicity’ (p. 11). Bell (2006) goes even further by comparing the inpatient anorexic individual to a ‘prisoner of the medical panopticon’, continuously observed and brought under control by means of treatment protocols that perpetuate ‘the social disciplinary control over women's bodies via mainstream medicine’ (p. 283).…”
Section: Treatment Culture and Subculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar ethnographic study as a participant observer in an inpatient unit, Gremillion (2003) wondered ‘whether the (frequently reported) anorexic experiences of isolation and competitiveness are amplified in this treatment setting’ (p. 20) and she suggested that ‘the system itself could play into illness chronicity’ (p. 11). Bell (2006) goes even further by comparing the inpatient anorexic individual to a ‘prisoner of the medical panopticon’, continuously observed and brought under control by means of treatment protocols that perpetuate ‘the social disciplinary control over women's bodies via mainstream medicine’ (p. 283).…”
Section: Treatment Culture and Subculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing people from stores and narrating their everyday life provide the people in the community an avenue for a ritualistic ‘correcting’ of wrong and narrating ways to solidify the community's moral foundation. Furthermore, they thus come to police (albeit in protracted ways) their own behaviour and penalize their own perpetual failure (Bell, : 291).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous observation is by its nature highly intrusive, as a person is observed throughout the 24 h period and all activities are subject to the professional gaze. One is reminded of an interesting comparison with the work of Bell 38 who writes in relation to the inpatient treatment of eating disorders. She identified parallels between the protocols governing these interventions and the Foucaultian idea of panoptic disciplinary power.…”
Section: A Moral Objection?mentioning
confidence: 99%