2003
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2003.9515032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re‐identification of c. 15 700 cal yr BP tephra bed at Kaipo Bog, eastern North Island: Implications for dispersal of Rotorua and Puketarata tephra beds

Abstract: A 10 mm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tephra is the product of an exceptionally large-volume eruption from TVC (Froggatt and Lowe, 1990;Wilson, 2001), dated at 26.5 ka. The 15.7 ka Rotorua tephra from OVC (Nairn, 2002) is found at 37.18 m at Onepoto and (Shane et al, 2003b). The dominant population has relatively high FeO and CaO contents compared to other OVC tephra, while the subordinant population is more evolved and displays a high K 2 O content (Fig.…”
Section: Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tephra is the product of an exceptionally large-volume eruption from TVC (Froggatt and Lowe, 1990;Wilson, 2001), dated at 26.5 ka. The 15.7 ka Rotorua tephra from OVC (Nairn, 2002) is found at 37.18 m at Onepoto and (Shane et al, 2003b). The dominant population has relatively high FeO and CaO contents compared to other OVC tephra, while the subordinant population is more evolved and displays a high K 2 O content (Fig.…”
Section: Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eden et al, 2001;Shane and Hoverd, 2002;Newnham et al, 2003). Once determined, such compositional variations actually enhance the potential for correlation, by providing additional criteria to guide geochemical fingerprinting (Shane et al, 2003b).…”
Section: Characterising Tephrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15). These biotite differences provided the key to identifying one of the distal tephras in the Kaipo bog sequence in eastern North Island that previously had been misidentified because its major-element glass chemistry matched that of two eruptives identical in age but derived from different volcanic sources (Shane et al, 2003a(Shane et al, , 2003b Analyses of Fe-Ti oxides, titanomagnetite and ilmenite, by EPMA have been useful for tephra fingerprinting for many years (e.g., Westgate and Evans, 1978;Hogg and McCraw, 1983;Beaudoin and King, 1986;Julian et al, 1988;Cronin et al, 1996;Smith et al, 2002;McHenry, 2005;Turner et al, 2009). The validity of such analysis as a correlation tool was supported by crystal field theory (Hodder, 1981).…”
Section: In Favourable Circumstances Individual Tephras May Be Identmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In defining and naming new tephras, or re-defining them, the usual rules of stratigraphic nomenclature apply but the need for care is emphasised and specialist guidance should be sought to avoid compounding any previous correlation errors or misnomers (Lowe, 1986a;Wilson, 1993;Shane et al, 2003a;Davies et al, 2004a;Westgate et al, 2008). In the first instance, applying unique "names" to new tephras (such as core number and depth of occurrence) is the optimum approach to reduce confusion and potential ambiguity if additional tephras are discovered during subsequent research (e.g., Bourne et al, in press).…”
Section: Defining and Using Type And Auxiliary Reference Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%