2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3943533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Identification of Plant Impressions on Prehistoric Pottery from Ukraine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further west in the Lower Danube region, regionally distinguishable burial customs reflect the adaptation of incoming pastoralists to the local populations of the tell settlements [ 225 ]. Within a few generations, culturally and linguistically diversifying Yamnaya groups would have had ample opportunity to acquire extensive knowledge of local agricultural practices, such as the use of plows, plowshares and sickles, as they have been documented archaeologically in the region in the fourth millennium BCE [ 43 ; 127 :88–95; 162 :48; 212 ], as indicated in Fig 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further west in the Lower Danube region, regionally distinguishable burial customs reflect the adaptation of incoming pastoralists to the local populations of the tell settlements [ 225 ]. Within a few generations, culturally and linguistically diversifying Yamnaya groups would have had ample opportunity to acquire extensive knowledge of local agricultural practices, such as the use of plows, plowshares and sickles, as they have been documented archaeologically in the region in the fourth millennium BCE [ 43 ; 127 :88–95; 162 :48; 212 ], as indicated in Fig 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, although archaeologists traditionally do not agree on the question of whether agriculture was practiced by steppe pastoralists, i.e. whether it was practiced sporadically, or in fact, not at all, current consensus appears to be leaning toward a negative answer [ 43 ]. Given these increasingly pessimistic results, the assumption that Proto-Indo-European had a wide range of terms for cereal cultivation and processing is not unambiguously consistent with the Steppe Hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a growing amount of data sheds doubt on the acquaintance of the indigenous groups of the Southern Buh River with an agriculture-based economy. The imprints of domestic plant seeds and pericarps in shards of para-Neolithic pottery were reexamined, and no compelling evidence of domesticates was found [14,84]. The archeozoological collections contained either no domestic animal bones or were mixed with later materials, thus casting doubt on the evidence of herding [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%