2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Freedom from Cancer Recurrence Rate

Abstract: Salvage re-irradiation (rRT) for patients with locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) remains challenging. A retrospective analysis was performed on 49 patients who received rRT between 2011 and 2018. The co-primary endpoint of the study was 2-year freedom from cancer recurrence rate (FCRR) and overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastases (DM), and RTOG grade 3 ≥ late toxicities. Adjuvant and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the high toxicity of EBRT re-irradiation, including grade 3 and 4 events, is its main limitation, leading to a reduction of the total dose on CTV and therefore of its effectiveness, so that many centres never perform it and deem it too risky and/or not effective enough. In fact, available reports of patients submitted to re-irradiation with EBRT show toxicity rates ≥ G3 ranging from 18.3% to 50% 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the high toxicity of EBRT re-irradiation, including grade 3 and 4 events, is its main limitation, leading to a reduction of the total dose on CTV and therefore of its effectiveness, so that many centres never perform it and deem it too risky and/or not effective enough. In fact, available reports of patients submitted to re-irradiation with EBRT show toxicity rates ≥ G3 ranging from 18.3% to 50% 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%