2017
DOI: 10.1177/0047281617692069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Re)Kindle

Abstract: In an effort to expand the range of ways graduate programs prepare students to be scholars and practitioners in technical and professional communication, this article argues for a fresh direct reengagement with stories, storytelling, and narrative as valuable ways of studying and effectively producing the varied texts of the workplace. The previous call for acknowledging the value of narrative traces back almost 30 years, and story is still being used in a variety of compelling ways, even as an overt regard fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the expansion of engineering communicative competence, it seems logical that standards in engineering education have been upgraded to include "the ability to communicate logically and persuasively in spoken, written, numerical, and visual forms" (National Academy of Engineering, 2006, p. 104). The greater emphasis placed on speaking skills by employers and the government is believed to be a very significant aspect of addressing the advanced challenges of professional engineering interaction (Small, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the expansion of engineering communicative competence, it seems logical that standards in engineering education have been upgraded to include "the ability to communicate logically and persuasively in spoken, written, numerical, and visual forms" (National Academy of Engineering, 2006, p. 104). The greater emphasis placed on speaking skills by employers and the government is believed to be a very significant aspect of addressing the advanced challenges of professional engineering interaction (Small, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%