2000
DOI: 10.1108/00251740010352848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re‐negotiating and re‐affirming in cross‐border marketing processes: a learning‐based conceptual model and research propositions

Abstract: Relationship marketing is the paradigm which is currently seen to offer insight into the internationalising process. This paper takes these concepts and links them together with notions of culture and learning in novel ways. The knowledge impacts of national and corporate culture need to be understood in the international exchange processes at the heart of cross-border/ cultural marketing. Relationship creation can then be incorporated into organisational learning so that the organisation learns, understands a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To continue to set the scene for this paper promoting marketing/accounting synergy it is worthwhile noting that marketing competence in a firm will include a learning capability. Relationship marketing has shown interest in learning in relationships (Ballantyne 2003;Halliday 2005;Halliday and Cawley 2000) and learning has been seen as core to innovation in the new product development literature (Kok, Hillebrand and Biemans 2003;Toivonen 2004). Trusting relationships have been seen as vital for a firm to create value (Halliday 2004;Vargo and Lusch 2004).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To continue to set the scene for this paper promoting marketing/accounting synergy it is worthwhile noting that marketing competence in a firm will include a learning capability. Relationship marketing has shown interest in learning in relationships (Ballantyne 2003;Halliday 2005;Halliday and Cawley 2000) and learning has been seen as core to innovation in the new product development literature (Kok, Hillebrand and Biemans 2003;Toivonen 2004). Trusting relationships have been seen as vital for a firm to create value (Halliday 2004;Vargo and Lusch 2004).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisational learning researchers (Argyris and Schon, 1996;Sinkula, Baker and Noordewier, 1997;Halliday and Cawley, 2000) have studied the implicit and explicit AU: References ' Argyris and Schon (1996), Angle et al (2000), Thamhain (2003) and Brown (2006)' have been cited in the text but not provided in the list. Please provide reference details or delete the citations from the text.…”
Section: An Innovation Community Learning Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'legitimacy of contribution' for community members rested on their perspectives of customer value orientation, and the important relationship with the innovation goals of the innovation community. Halliday and Cawley's (2000) refinement of Sinkula, Baker and Noordewier (1997) original organisational learning framework to include cultural dynamics associated with retrospective and prospective sensemaking, attempted to incorporate self-reflexivity into the analysis of organisational members' sensemaking and their engage on joint enterprises. They suggested the need for further research on organisational cultural interdependence based around their retrospective and prospective interpretation of behaviour and outcomes.…”
Section: Figure 4 Community Learning Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationship marketing has shown interest in learning in relationships (Ballantyne 2003;Halliday 2005;Halliday and Cawley 2000) and learning has been seen as core to innovation in the new product development literature (Kok, Hillebrand and Biemans 2003;Toivonen 2004). Trusting relationships have been seen as vital for a firm to create value (Halliday 2004;Vargo and Lusch 2004).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%