2021
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Re)proposal of three Cambrian Subsystems and their Geochronology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Landing et al (2020), I do not necessarily advocate the introduction of another (subsystem) level to the Cambrian chronostratigraphic hierarchy. However, it is possible that the ISCS may consider this possibility in the future.…”
Section: Alternative Subsystem Proposalmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike Landing et al (2020), I do not necessarily advocate the introduction of another (subsystem) level to the Cambrian chronostratigraphic hierarchy. However, it is possible that the ISCS may consider this possibility in the future.…”
Section: Alternative Subsystem Proposalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The proposal of Landing et al (2020) is for the adoption of a scale of three Cambrian subsystems, the lowest of which embraces the two lowest global series, whereas the remaining two coincide with the global Miaolingian and Furongian series. These are proposed to be named Lower Cambrian Subsystem, Middle Cambrian Subsystem and Upper Cambrian Subsystem (with their corresponding Subperiods).…”
Section: Subsystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations