2014
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: Response to Magos et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the prior electronic medical record-based prevalence study, a greater proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes were found to have a concurrent diagnosis of gastroparesis compared with type 2 diabetes (4.6 vs 1.3%). 6 In the current report, the prevalence of gastroparesis in type 2 diabetes was 9-fold of that in type 1 diabetes. It is also not clear whether the 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient diagnosis criteria refer to the primary diagnosis.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the prior electronic medical record-based prevalence study, a greater proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes were found to have a concurrent diagnosis of gastroparesis compared with type 2 diabetes (4.6 vs 1.3%). 6 In the current report, the prevalence of gastroparesis in type 2 diabetes was 9-fold of that in type 1 diabetes. It is also not clear whether the 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient diagnosis criteria refer to the primary diagnosis.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This study reports 11% of gastroparesis being idiopathic, which is lower than the proportion reported in the GpCRC registries 7 as well as other United States population-based cohorts. 6,8 This could be due to the postsurgical (15%) and drug-induced (12%) gastroparesis reported in the current study. Other prevalence studies, including those from GpCRC, include drug-induced gastroparesis in the idiopathic category.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8] The advent of nanotechnology represents a groundbreaking advancement in infection control, offering a promising avenue to address the intricate challenges posed by pathogens. [9][10][11] By leveraging the unique properties of materials at the nanoscale, nanotechnology has revolutionized diverse fields, with healthcare being a prominent beneficiary. [12,13] In the realm of infection control, nanotechnology provides a versatile toolbox for precise targeting, improved drug delivery, and innovative antimicrobial strategies, heralding a paradigm shift in the fight against infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%