Re-Scanning the Electronic Certificate Infrastructure (Sertipikat-el)

Abstract

An electronic certificate (Sertipikat-el) results from a series of electronic land registration activities in electronic documents that should be digital eviden­ce. This paper describes the infrastructure of Sertipikat-el and offers steps that can be taken so that Sertipikat-el does not lose its essence as evidence of ownership and not ruled out in evidence at trial. Sertipikat-el in electronic documents does not violate the laws and regulations. Unfortunately, the electronic system used to create and manage Sertipikat-el does not meet all requirements so that it can guarantee that each component and the integration of all electronic systems continue to operate properly by minimizing the failure of electronic systems. Although Sertipikat-el has been determined in electronic documents, it has not been further regulated regarding data input and information. For this reason, there is a need for a complete revision of ministerial regulations and imple­men­tation related to electronic land registration at the technical level in the field. To ensure the used electronic system's essential function to create and manage the Sertipikat-el continues to run even in the event of a disaster or disruption, the electronic system needs to be registered. A reliability test and an audit from the competent agency are carried out. In addition, the system must also have archival functionality and be defined from the beginning whether the creation and management of Sertipikat-el are carried out in an electronic system or not because it will affect the method of presenting Sertipikat-el data as digital evidence at the trial.

Politik hukum pendaftaran tanah elektronik pasca undang-undang cipta kerja

“…3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government, yang akan meningkatkan akuntabilitas, efisiensi, efektivitas dan transparansi (Andiyanto et al, 2021). Ssertifikat tanah elektronik merupakan produk hukum dari rangkaian pendaftaran tanah elektronik dan sah secara hukum sebagai bukti kepemilikan atas bidang tanah (Sapardiyono & Pinuji, 2022;Wulan et al, 2022).…”

Land Archive Authentication as a Result of Media Transfer at the Land Office

“…Previous studies have touched upon the authentication of digitally digitized archive documents, albeit mainly in the context of archival institutions. These include studies by Anindyati (2020) that examine the application of digitized archives in the Laris application and whether digital archives can replace original paper archives; Listiyani & Alamsyah (2019), which discuss efforts to preserve the authenticity of digital archives at the Archives and Library Office of Semarang Regency; Christiani & Sutrisno (2019), which analyze the authentication process of digital archives at the Archives and Library Office of Central Java Province; Setianingsih (2022), who address the authentication process of digital archives resulting from media transfer and identify challenges in implementing the authentication process due to media transfer (Mujiburohman, 2021;Muhidin et al, 2016); Rusmiatiningsih (2017Rusmiatiningsih ( & 2019, who provide interpretations of the status of electronic archives as valid evidentiary tools and the role of archivists in the legal field; Andari & Mujiburohman (2023), Wulan et al (2022), andSalim et al (2022), who delve into policy and legal arguments in the context of media transfer and its admissibility in court.…”