2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1084034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Validating the Doctrine of Anticipatory Nuisance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides a framework for balancing human uses of the marine area and managing their impact. 137 In a sense, it takes ICZM principles, articulates them at a high level of generality, and pushes them further out to sea. ICZM and MSP are by no means incompatible, but the relationship between the two is not clearly set out-although opportunities for coordination and cooperation exist and are encouraged.…”
Section: Comparing Principled Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It provides a framework for balancing human uses of the marine area and managing their impact. 137 In a sense, it takes ICZM principles, articulates them at a high level of generality, and pushes them further out to sea. ICZM and MSP are by no means incompatible, but the relationship between the two is not clearly set out-although opportunities for coordination and cooperation exist and are encouraged.…”
Section: Comparing Principled Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…136 Furthermore, while courts' application of the reasonable certainty standard has been inconsistent, it generally requires a high probability of injury. 137 The high burden of proof a plaintiff must show to prove injury and the inconsistency in the application of this doctrine have discouraged plaintiffs from utilizing this cause of action. 138 A reasonable analysis must include a focus on the probability of future injury.…”
Section: B Anticipatory Nuisancementioning
confidence: 99%