2021
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/yf4he
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-validation and adaptation of the Menstrual Practice Needs Scale to measure the menstrual experiences of adult women working in Mukono District, Uganda

Abstract: Objectives. The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS) is a comprehensive measure of menstrual self-care experience including access to sufficient, comfortable absorbents, supportive spaces for managing menstruation and for disposal and laundering of used materials. It addresses a critical measurement gap to improve quantitative menstrual health research. The scale was validated in a population of adolescent schoolgirls. This study appraises its performance among adult women.Methods. Seven cognitive interviews … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total mean score was calculated across all items applicable to the respondent. The MPNS performance in this population was assessed and is reported elsewhere [43]. The revised scale for adults was used for analysis.…”
Section: Menstrual Health Needs (Exposures)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total mean score was calculated across all items applicable to the respondent. The MPNS performance in this population was assessed and is reported elsewhere [43]. The revised scale for adults was used for analysis.…”
Section: Menstrual Health Needs (Exposures)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should investigate these effects in a larger sample of different worker groups. To assess menstrual management needs we used the newly validated Menstrual Practice Needs Scale to offer a comprehensive assessment [42,43]. We used the total score, rather than sub-scales to assess needs across the broad spectrum of blood management practices.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%