2009
DOI: 10.1177/1742395309343978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education

Abstract: The DVD appears to have merit as an efficient and appealing alternative to brief classroom-based diabetes education, and the hybrid design is recommended to provide estimates of programme reach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,4,16 The longer term effects are much less consistent, and many persons do not participate in DSM education. 5,[17][18][19] The smaller and evolving literature on Internet and computerbased DSM programs 7,8,20,21 is similarly encouraging but mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1,4,16 The longer term effects are much less consistent, and many persons do not participate in DSM education. 5,[17][18][19] The smaller and evolving literature on Internet and computerbased DSM programs 7,8,20,21 is similarly encouraging but mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Patient confidentiality must be assured in an age of ever-greater interconnectivity. Also, while IHCAs have the potential to reach a large number of patients at less cost than in-person diabetes education or care management visits [13,14], they still require funding and staff support to assure their effectiveness in specific settings and integration with the rest of a patient's care to ensure attention to individual patient needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our process evaluation was based upon telephone interviews with the nutrition experts directly involved in intervention delivery. Our assessment used elements (47) of the RE-AIM framework, specifically focusing on reach (proportion of target population participating in intervention), effectiveness and implementation (e.g. fidelity to or adaptation of the intervention schedule and its components and the effort required to organize intervention-related activities within each pre-school setting).…”
Section: Process Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reach was reflected by the proportion of participating children and parents compared with the total number of targeted, eligible and recruited children and parents. Implementation ratings adapted from Glasgow et al (47) on fidelity to planned intervention delivery, total intervention content covered by the experts, effort to get activities organized and the level of parental commitment were given on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 5 not at all/none to 5 5 completely/ a great deal, separately for parent and children's modules, based upon ratings by the nutrition experts.…”
Section: Process Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%