2000
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction–Diffusion in Irregular Domains

Abstract: We consider the Cauchy Dirichlet and Dirichlet problems for the nonlinear parabolic equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These purely technical assumptions can be got rid of [1]; our blow-up spectralboundary layer approach is also assumptionless and rigorous for the heat equation, see Sect. 7.7.…”
Section: On Some Details Of Petrovskii's Analysis In 1934-1935 and Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These purely technical assumptions can be got rid of [1]; our blow-up spectralboundary layer approach is also assumptionless and rigorous for the heat equation, see Sect. 7.7.…”
Section: On Some Details Of Petrovskii's Analysis In 1934-1935 and Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrovskii's integral criterion of the Dini-Osgood type given in (3.11) is true in the N -dimensional radial case with (see [1]- [3] for the recent updating)…”
Section: On Some Details Of Petrovskii's Analysis In 1934-1935 and Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many cases this may be a characteristic single point. It should be mentioned that in the one-dimensional case Dirichlet and Cauchy-Dirichlet problems for the reaction-diffusion equations in irregular domains were studied in papers by the author [11,12]. Primarily applying this theory a complete description of the evolution of interfaces were presented in other papers [13,14].…”
Section: Boundary Value Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the uniqueness and comparison results of this paper significantly improve the one-dimensional results from [11,12], we describe the one-dimensional results separately in Section 3. We prove Theorems 2.2, 2.6, and 2.7 in Sections 4-6, respectively.…”
Section: Boundary Value Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%