1995
DOI: 10.1021/j100019a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction-Diffusion Model for A + A Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the nucleation rate is proportional to ρ 3 k in systems where nucleation does not occur in pairs [18,19]. The latter scaling was incorrectly predicted for the φ 4 system [8], from an estimate of the annihilation rate that does not take into account paired nucleation.…”
Section: Fig 4 Recombination Time Density Only Recombinant Historimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the nucleation rate is proportional to ρ 3 k in systems where nucleation does not occur in pairs [18,19]. The latter scaling was incorrectly predicted for the φ 4 system [8], from an estimate of the annihilation rate that does not take into account paired nucleation.…”
Section: Fig 4 Recombination Time Density Only Recombinant Historimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the stochastic approaches currently in use differ in their results from rate equations in the limit of a small number of reactive species per grain, these approaches still incorporate an approximation that may lead to error. The reasons for the possible error have been studied in some detail in the statistical physics literature (Lin et al 1996;Hinrichsen 2000;Krug 2003;Lindenberg et al 1995;Weiss & Rubin 1983;Simon 1995), but for our purposes here, one can simplify the problem in the following manner. The basic common assumption to the previous methods utilized is that the rate of reaction is determined by the rate of hopping (or tunneling) of a hydrogen atom from one site to a nearest neighbor site multiplied by the probability of finding a reactant partner in this site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the A + B reaction the typical reaction term simply involves the product of the local concentrations of reactants, −ka(r, t)b(r, t) [1]. In the A+A reaction one has to be slightly more careful because in writing, for example, −ka 2 (r, t) one must be careful not to include spurious self-reaction contributions [5,8]. Once the A + A exact models were developed that did not require one to explicitly write a reaction term, it was possible to analyze the accuracy of the approximate truncations [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%