2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction mechanism of reductive decomposition of FGD gypsum with anthracite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the carbon of char had an obvious decline with the addition of CaSO 4 correspondingly. The results were consistent with the reactions between carbon and CaSO 4 [15,16], which indicated that the carbon of coal as a solid reductant might be responsible for CaSO 4 decomposition during coal pyrolysis.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Caso 4 Decomposition During Coal Pyrolysissupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the carbon of char had an obvious decline with the addition of CaSO 4 correspondingly. The results were consistent with the reactions between carbon and CaSO 4 [15,16], which indicated that the carbon of coal as a solid reductant might be responsible for CaSO 4 decomposition during coal pyrolysis.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Caso 4 Decomposition During Coal Pyrolysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to the previous literatures [15,16], there were two possible mechanisms. One approach was solid-solid reaction mechanism:…”
Section: Mechanism Of Caso 4 Decomposition During Coal Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors have studied the conversion of CaSO 4 into CaS through the carbothermal reaction (Zheng et al, 2013, Zheng et al, 2011, Nengovhela et al, 2007, Van der Merwe et al, 1999. Strydom et al (1997) confirmed the need to perform thermal reduction of CaSO 4 using carbon as a reducing agent in the absence of air, as air was observed to impact negatively on the conversion of CaSO 4 to CaS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the desulfurization system must be employed in coal-fired units, and more than two hundred kinds of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies have been studied, of which dozens have already been in operation. The wet FGD (WFGD) technologies account for about 85% for control technology of SO 2 all over the world and desulfurization based on limestone accounts for 90% for the control technology of SO 2 in China [2,3]. However, the desulfurization basing on limestone results in the following questions in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%