1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.59.974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction (dpol,2He) at intermediate energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these conditions, the final-state interaction in the 1 S 0 state of the pp system is very strong. The impulse approximation predictions were tested successfully for very small E pp at beam energies of T d = 1.6 GeV and 2.0 GeV using both hydrogen and deuterium targets [3,4,5]. A refined numerical evaluation [6] proved that the theoretical description was equally valid over a larger E pp range at 200 and 350 MeV [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, the final-state interaction in the 1 S 0 state of the pp system is very strong. The impulse approximation predictions were tested successfully for very small E pp at beam energies of T d = 1.6 GeV and 2.0 GeV using both hydrogen and deuterium targets [3,4,5]. A refined numerical evaluation [6] proved that the theoretical description was equally valid over a larger E pp range at 200 and 350 MeV [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve maximum sensitivity, the excitation energy E pp in the final pp system must be very low so that the final diproton is in the 1 S 0 configuration. Experiments from a few hundred MeV up to 2 GeV [7,8] have generally borne out well predictions based upon the impulse approximation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known, that the ∆ feels an attractive potential of about -30 MeV at normal nuclear density [19], which has an effect on any production process involving the ∆. Indeed, in ( 3 He, t) and (d, 2 He) reactions a shift of the ∆-peak relative to the reaction on the proton has been observed [47,48]. A considerable part of this shift is, however, due to trivial effects e.g.…”
Section: Medium Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%