1998
DOI: 10.1116/1.581234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of 1,2-ethanedithiol on clean, sulfur-modified, and carbon-modified Mo (110) surfaces

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inAngular and energy distributions of D 2 molecules desorbing from sulfur and oxygen modified V(111) surfaces Chemical and spectroscopic surface science investigation of MoO 3 and MoO 3 /Al 2 O 3 ultrathin films J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 1717 (1997); 10.1116/1.580926 Adsorption state of hydrogen sulfide on the GaAs (001)-(4×2) surface J.The reactivity of 1,2-ethanedithiol on the clean Mo ͑110͒ and p(4ϫ4)-C/Mo ͑110͒ surfaces has been investigated as a function of sulfur coverage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XPS shows substantial sulfur at the film surface after exposure to EDT (Figure ), and the C−H stretch signal in the FTIR spectra is as strong as expected for quantitative replacement of oleate with EDT (Figure ). The absence of the S−H stretch at ∼2550 cm −1 suggests that adsorbed EDT exists as ethanedithiolate , bound in a bidentate fashion either on single NCs or between NCs. Furthermore, the sulfur 2p 3/2 X-ray photoelectron peak at 161.5 eV is characteristic of bound thiolate rather than the free C−S−H moiety .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XPS shows substantial sulfur at the film surface after exposure to EDT (Figure ), and the C−H stretch signal in the FTIR spectra is as strong as expected for quantitative replacement of oleate with EDT (Figure ). The absence of the S−H stretch at ∼2550 cm −1 suggests that adsorbed EDT exists as ethanedithiolate , bound in a bidentate fashion either on single NCs or between NCs. Furthermore, the sulfur 2p 3/2 X-ray photoelectron peak at 161.5 eV is characteristic of bound thiolate rather than the free C−S−H moiety .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the absorption peak at 2550 cm –1 from the S–H stretching vibration is absent in the EDT-CsPbBr 3 NC sample, indicating that EDT exists in the form of ethanedithiolate (Figure S1). The H 1 NMR spectrum in Figure b shows the characteristic resonances of the ODE at 4.96 and 5.81 ppm in oleate-CsPbBr 3 NCs, indicating long-chain oleate ligands capping on the surface of oleate-CsPbBr 3 NCs. Inversely, resonances of ODE in the EDT-treated sample almost disappeared and the resonance of EDT at 2.83 ppm elucidates the effective removal of long-chain oleate ligands by EDT treatment (the reference H 1 NMR spectra of oleic acid, oleylamine, octadecene, and ethanedithiol are shown in Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 1a compares the FTIR spectra of oleate-CsPbBr S1). 29 The H 1 NMR spectrum in Figure 1b S1. The consistent negative shift of peaks (Cs 3d, Pb 4f, and Br 3d) indicates the interaction between EDT and oleate-CsPbBr 3 NCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the possible structures associated with this formula, the most promising candidate for assignment of the band at 158 K is 1,2-ethanedithiol (HSCH 2 CH 2 SH). The relative intensities of the mass fragments match well with the reference values for HSCH 2 CH 2 SH provided by the NIST (Figure , right panel), and the desorption temperature is also in line with a slightly higher value of 180 K measured by Roe and Schulz for one layer of HSCH 2 CH 2 SH on a molybdenum (110) surface with adsorbed carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%