2000
DOI: 10.1021/jp9924631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of HO2 with ClO:  Flow Tube Studies of Kinetics and Product Formation between 215 and 298 K

Abstract: Rate coefficients for the reaction between HO2 and ClO radicals were obtained using the discharge-flow/mass-spectrometry technique at total pressures of 1.1−1.7 Torr of He, and between 298 and 215 K. The room-temperature rate constant, determined using seven different combinations of HO2 and ClO precursors, was found to be (7.1 ± 1.8) × 10-12 (±2σ) cm3 s-1. The temperature-dependent overall reaction rate coefficient is described by k (3) (298−215 K) = (7.1 ± 0.4) × 10-12 exp(−16 ± 17/T) cm3 s-1. The previous o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…d At temperatures T ≤ 270 K, the HO 2 profiles were better fitted with the rate constant 7.1 × 10 −12 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 (independent of temperature) as measured recently [23].…”
Section: Rate Constant Of the Hcl-forming Channel (1b)mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…d At temperatures T ≤ 270 K, the HO 2 profiles were better fitted with the rate constant 7.1 × 10 −12 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 (independent of temperature) as measured recently [23].…”
Section: Rate Constant Of the Hcl-forming Channel (1b)mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Table 1 shows k 1 and the error (1σ ) calculated from previous laboratory studies at 225 K (which corresponds to the typical temperature of the lower stratosphere). A discrepancy of a factor of 2 between the k 1 values from Stimpfle et al (1979) and Knight et al (2000) can be noticed. There is no consistency in the previous laboratory studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We compared our derived k 1 , hereafter denoted "SMILES k 1 ", with previous laboratory experiments (Stimpfle et al, 1979;Knight et al, 2000;Nickolaisen et al, 2000;Hickson et al, 2007), an ab initio calculation (Xu et al, 2003), and JPL 2011 recommendation (Sander et al, 2011). Figure 7 shows the comparison of k 1 from our work and that from previous works.…”
Section: Comparison Of K 1 With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations