2002
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.577.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of Some Plum Cultivars to Sharka Virus (Plum Pox Virus, PPV-M Strain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state of trees was determined visually on a 0–3 point rating scale for symptoms on the leaves. The symptoms of the fruit were investigated, when the fruit consumption maturity was reached on a 0–3 point rating scale according to Iliev and Stoev [ 34 ]. Tree vigor and canopy shape assessed on a 1–9 point rating scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of trees was determined visually on a 0–3 point rating scale for symptoms on the leaves. The symptoms of the fruit were investigated, when the fruit consumption maturity was reached on a 0–3 point rating scale according to Iliev and Stoev [ 34 ]. Tree vigor and canopy shape assessed on a 1–9 point rating scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symptoms on the fruits were investigated when the consumption maturity was reached. A 0-3 point scale was used, where 0 -means fruits without symptoms, 1 -superficial symptoms without deterioration of the fruit quality; 2 -to 10% of the fruit with sharka symptoms, fruit abscission and low quality for consumption; 3 -over 10% of fruits with pathological changes (Iliev, Stoev 2002). Tree growth vigour was expressed by the thickness of the trunk measured annually in the autumn in a permanently marked place at a height of 30 cm above the grafting union.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%