1960
DOI: 10.1080/00049536008255050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction potential and the intervening variable question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is very roughly analogous to the substitution of judgment-time for the judgment itself in classical psychophysics (see Guilford, I 954, p. 145) though in the latter procedure one is still concerned with the time taken to make a choice between two stimuli (or response classes). In contrast, we are here concerned with a theoretical parallel between the models, when both are considered as models for response choice, and the argument is closely related to a previous discussion of the methodological status of reaction potential (McDonald, 1960). A careful examination of the details of Hull's quantification attempt, especially on the statistical side, remains to be done, but this would take us too far afield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is very roughly analogous to the substitution of judgment-time for the judgment itself in classical psychophysics (see Guilford, I 954, p. 145) though in the latter procedure one is still concerned with the time taken to make a choice between two stimuli (or response classes). In contrast, we are here concerned with a theoretical parallel between the models, when both are considered as models for response choice, and the argument is closely related to a previous discussion of the methodological status of reaction potential (McDonald, 1960). A careful examination of the details of Hull's quantification attempt, especially on the statistical side, remains to be done, but this would take us too far afield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%