This paper reports an experiment on the understandability of pictorial symbols proposed for fire-safety alerting. The purpose of the experiment was two-fold: 1) to determine the understandability of each symbol to a group of potential users; and 2) to assess the effects of variations in both presentation and response methods upon the measurement of unders tandabi lity . Twenty-five symbols, of which twenty-two had been proposed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) were evaluated for understandability with 91 U.S. subjects. These symbols were presented in three different ways: slides, placards, or booklets. Subjects indicated their understanding of each symbol's meaning by one of two response methods:by writing a brief definition or by selecting the correct definition from among four alternatives.In addition, for both methods, subjects rated their confidence in the correctness of their answers.In a second phase of the experiment, all subjects were given 15 different messages and asked to draw a symbol that would convey each message.The results revealed no effect of the mode of symbol presentation. The definition and multiple choice response procedures led to generally similar conclusions.The confidence ratings provided useful additional information and helped to reconcile some of the discrepancies between the two response methods. Advantages and disadvantages of both methods are discussed.The understandability of the 25 symbols ranged from near zero to virtually complete comprehension. The poor performance of some critical symbols such as "exit" was noted, and some potentially dangerous confusions in meaning were revealed. The drawings produced by subjects for given referents (or symbol meanings) were most likely to be different in image from ISO proposed symbols for those symbols which were poorly understood. These data underscore the importance of determining the understandability of safety symbols before symbol standards are adopted.iii Table of Contents Pa£e ABSTRACT iii