2012
DOI: 10.1021/om201230u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of a Triruthenium Pentahydrido Complex with Imines Leading to the Formation of a Perpendicularly Coordinated Iminoacyl Ligand and the Scission of a C═N Bond on a Triruthenium Plane

Abstract: The reaction of a triruthenium pentahydrido complex, {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)}3(μ3-H)2 (1; Cp* = η5-C5Me5), with N-benzylidenemethylamine resulted in the exclusive formation of a perpendicularly coordinated iminoacyl complex, (Cp*Ru)3(μ-η2:η2(⊥)-PhCNMe)­(μ-H)2 (3b), as a result of C–H bond scission of imine. However, the treatment of 1 with N-benzylideneaniline at 100 °C caused C–N bond cleavage to yield the μ3-benzylidyne−μ3-phenylimido complex (Cp*Ru)3(μ3-CPh)­(μ3-NPh)­(μ-H)2 (7c) and the μ3-methylidyne−μ3-phenylimido c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge all binuclear iminoacyl-bridged complexes reported so far invariably display a 3-electron donor μ-C:N coordination mode. However, a related μ 3 -C,N:C,N:C coordination mode has been proposed to be present in a few trinuclear clusters, 18 although not substantiated crystallographically. The unstable compound 2 gives rise to a 31 P NMR resonance at 168.4 ppm, a position comparable to that of its most stable isomer 4 (δ P 161.3 ppm), thus suggesting their close structural relationship.…”
Section: Structural Characterization Of Compounds 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge all binuclear iminoacyl-bridged complexes reported so far invariably display a 3-electron donor μ-C:N coordination mode. However, a related μ 3 -C,N:C,N:C coordination mode has been proposed to be present in a few trinuclear clusters, 18 although not substantiated crystallographically. The unstable compound 2 gives rise to a 31 P NMR resonance at 168.4 ppm, a position comparable to that of its most stable isomer 4 (δ P 161.3 ppm), thus suggesting their close structural relationship.…”
Section: Structural Characterization Of Compounds 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of the μ 3 -η 2 (∥)-imidoyl complex (Cp*Ru) 3 (H) 4 {μ 3 -η 2 (∥)-PhCNMe} was indicated upon reaction of the perpendicularly coordinated μ 3 -η 2 :η 2 (⊥)-imidoyl complex (Cp*Ru)(μ-H) 2 -{μ 3 -η 2 :η 2 (⊥)-PhCNMe} with H 2 , although the μ 3 -η 2 (∥)imidoyl complex was not isolated due to facile dehydrogenation that regenerated the perpendicular form. 30 Herein, we report on the consecutive transformations of a nitrile ligand on a Ru 3 plane into a primary amine and the catalytic properties of the triruthenium complexes {Cp*Ru(μ-H)} 3 (μ 3 -H) 2 (1) and (Cp*Ru) 3 (μ 3 -H)(μ-H) 2 (μ-CO) (12) toward benzonitrile hydrogenation. The reactions are suitable models for the "M−C" and "M−N" routes, respectively, of nitrile hydrogenation on a metal surface.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a vacant site is readily generated at the Ru 3 site via intramolecular reductive C–H bond formation, which affords a μ-methylene isomer. This motion is known for the isostructural [(Cp*Ru) 3 (μ 3 -CH)­(μ-H) 2 (μ 3 -NPh)] and other μ 3 -methylidyne complexes . The 1 H NMR spectrum of 3 recorded at −80 °C displayed a C S structure, where the Cp* signals appeared at δ 2.00 and 1.81 ppm with an intensity ratio of 2:1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%