1991
DOI: 10.1021/om00054a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of [Cp*RuOMe]2. 7. Intramolecular transformation of a RuOCH3 unit into a Ru(CO)H unit: crystal and molecular structure of Cp*Ru(.mu.-H)2(.mu.-CO)RuCp*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The five-membered ring seems to be planar, but this is most likely due to the disordered structure between the inversion isomers of the five-membered ring. Values of 2.048(6) Å for the Ru(1)–C(1) and Ru(2)–C(1) distances correspond to Ru–C single bonds and are similar to those of bridging alkylidene complexes of ruthenium. The Ru(1)–Ru(2) distance of 2.4167(3) Å is similar to those observed in dinuclear ruthenium complexes with a 30-electron configuration containing two bridging hydrides, such as 1a (2.4630(5) Å), {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-SiPh 2 ) (2.4683(5) Å), {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-SiEtMe) (2.4492(9) Å), and {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-CO) (2.444(1) Å) . Although hydrogen atoms directly bound to the ruthenium atoms were not located in the Fourier maps, they would be located in the space on the opposite side of the carbene ligand with respect to the Ru–Ru vector.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The five-membered ring seems to be planar, but this is most likely due to the disordered structure between the inversion isomers of the five-membered ring. Values of 2.048(6) Å for the Ru(1)–C(1) and Ru(2)–C(1) distances correspond to Ru–C single bonds and are similar to those of bridging alkylidene complexes of ruthenium. The Ru(1)–Ru(2) distance of 2.4167(3) Å is similar to those observed in dinuclear ruthenium complexes with a 30-electron configuration containing two bridging hydrides, such as 1a (2.4630(5) Å), {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-SiPh 2 ) (2.4683(5) Å), {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-SiEtMe) (2.4492(9) Å), and {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 ­(μ-CO) (2.444(1) Å) . Although hydrogen atoms directly bound to the ruthenium atoms were not located in the Fourier maps, they would be located in the space on the opposite side of the carbene ligand with respect to the Ru–Ru vector.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The analogous dicationic PMe 3 complex, [Cp*(PMe 3 )Ir(μ-H)] 2 2+ , has not been reported, perhaps because the larger steric demand of the PMe 3 ligands prevents dimerization of [Cp*(PMe 3 )Ir(H)] + fragments. Analogous neutral complexes of the form [Cp*(CO)M(μ-H)] 2 have been previously reported for osmium and ruthenium; however, the reactivity of these species has not been reported. Yamaguchi and co-workers reported a similar dicationic dimer of iridium that contains the N-heterocyclic carbene ligand 1,3,4,5-tetramethylimidazol-2-ylidene in place of the CO ligands in 9 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A small amount of {Cp*Ru­(μ-H)} 2 (μ-CO) ( 15 ) (6%) formed during the hydrogenation of 14 is confirmed by 1 H NMR signals (δ 1.79 (Cp*) and −12.88 ppm (RuH)) in C 6 D 6 . Complex 15 is produced by thermolysis of 13 at 110 °C under an Ar atmosphere.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%