1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00394372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of fish to sound generated by divers' open-circuit underwater breathing apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would have been diffi cult to obtain similar data during several consecutive days with the same scuba diver. Moreover, the static and discrete video system has been outlined as an appropriate tool for the study of fi sh behaviour, due to its low disturbance compared to divers, whose presence can induce changes of fi sh behaviour (Chapman et al 1974, Hannah and Blume 2012, Mallet et al 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would have been diffi cult to obtain similar data during several consecutive days with the same scuba diver. Moreover, the static and discrete video system has been outlined as an appropriate tool for the study of fi sh behaviour, due to its low disturbance compared to divers, whose presence can induce changes of fi sh behaviour (Chapman et al 1974, Hannah and Blume 2012, Mallet et al 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the field work days were the same and there was no loss in resolution power, a goal when a rapid assess of demersal elasmobranch populations is the fieldwork objective. Not only may the difference in area surveyed be responsible for the found difference, but also the presence of the UVC SCUBA diver could be affecting fish behaviour (Chapman et al 1974;Chapman and Atkinson 1986;Costello 1992), limiting the real value of presence/absence of this species (e.g. Kulbicki 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Leum & Choat 1980, McCormick 1989), those exploited by commercial or recreational fishers tend to be behaviourally adaptable predatory species which may rapidly alter their response to divers (e.g. Chapman et al 1974, Chapman & Atkinson 1986. This can cause severe bias in between-site compansons based on diver surveys where fishing presSure is significant (Jennings & Polunin 1995, Kulbicki 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%