1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(79)80106-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of iron monosulfide solids with aqueous hydrogen sulfide up to 160°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with the D8 Discover system (Bruker) with IµS radiation source (2 mm in diameter), and a Lynxexe XE detector. Samples were dried for 2 h under a continuous stream of 100% N 2 and measured within 48 h under air as described previously (49). Measurements were done using CuKα rays in angles ranging from 10–70° 2θ in 0.02° steps with 2,880 sec measuring time and a total measuring time of 12 h and 47 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with the D8 Discover system (Bruker) with IµS radiation source (2 mm in diameter), and a Lynxexe XE detector. Samples were dried for 2 h under a continuous stream of 100% N 2 and measured within 48 h under air as described previously (49). Measurements were done using CuKα rays in angles ranging from 10–70° 2θ in 0.02° steps with 2,880 sec measuring time and a total measuring time of 12 h and 47 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russell et al, 1989Russell et al, , 1994Russell 2003, 2007) from the alternative, avowedly non-cellular hypothesis, namely the ''Theory of Surface Metabolism'' energized by ''pyrite-pulled reactions'' proposed by Wächtershäuser (1988aWächtershäuser ( , b, 2006; and see Taylor et al 1979). Huber and Wächtershäuser (2006, p 631) have underscored one particular distinction between the two hypotheses when they remark their ''proposal of primordial carbon fixation within a quenched flow of volcanic fluids contrasts with the proposal of primordial carbon-fixation reactions at the interface between aqueous, hydrothermal H 2 and aqueous CO 2 in an acidic ocean (Martin and Russell 2003;Russell and Martin 2004)''.…”
Section: The Two Autogenic Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…All three hydrogenases may ultimately go back to the conversion of FeS/H 2 S to FeS 2 /H 2 [38,39], for which a mechanism is postulated (Figure 1.3) that starts from aqueous [FeS] aq [40] and assumes a nucleophilic attack of a sulfide ligand on the sulfur atom of H 2 S to form a persulfide ligand (as source for FeS 2 ) [40] in combination with either formation of H 2 by reaction of a hydride ligand with H + or reduction of a substrate X by hydride or electron transfer. From this urhydrogenase/reductase chemistry, the evolution of hydrogenases began by abandonment of irreversible pyrite formation in favor of catalytic cycling, reversal of H 2 -formation into H 2 -uptake, and substrate reduction (e.g., persulfide cleavage).…”
Section: Retrodicting Pioneer Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%