1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(98)00525-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of metalloalkynes 3. Facile synthesis of pentanuclear ruthenium clusters. X-ray structures of [Ru5(μ5-CC)(η-C5H4R)2(dppm)(μ2-CO)2(CO)7] (R=H, CH3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found that the CpRu(CO) 2 moiety is extremely flexible in its mode of coordination and has allowed us to investigate a number of unusual bonding situations. Thus, we first decided to attempt the formation of mono-alkynyl complexes to provide suitable models for the formation of oligomeric complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found that the CpRu(CO) 2 moiety is extremely flexible in its mode of coordination and has allowed us to investigate a number of unusual bonding situations. Thus, we first decided to attempt the formation of mono-alkynyl complexes to provide suitable models for the formation of oligomeric complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we present the results of the synthesis and structural characterization of some coinage metal (Cu and Ag) adducts of [{Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 R)} 2 (μ 2 -CC)] ( 1a , R = H; 1b , R = Me), continuing an investigation of ruthenium ethyne-1,2-diyl complexes. The structures of the adducts were probed in solution and the solid state, resulting in the single-crystal X-ray structure determinations of [Ag 3 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 Me)} 2 (μ 2 -η 1 :η 1 -CC)) 3 ]­(O 3 SCF 3 ) 3 ( 2b ), [Ag 3 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 R)} 2 (μ 2 -η 1 :η 1 -CC))­({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 R)} 2 (μ 2 -η 1 :η 2 -CC)) 2 ]­(BF 4 ) 3 (R = H, 3a ; R = Me, 3b ), [Ag 4 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 R)} 2 (μ 2 -η 2 -CC)) 2 ]­(μ 2 -O 2 CCF 3 ) 4 (R = H, 4a ; Me, 4b ), [Ag­({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )} 2 (η 2 -CC)) 2 ]­(BF 4 ) ( 5 ), [Cu­({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )} 2 (η 2 -CC)) 2 ]­(PF 6 ) ( 6 ), [Cu 3 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )} 2 (μ 2 -η 1 :η 2 -CC))­({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )} 2 (μ 2 -η 2 -CC))]­(PF 6 ) 3 ( 7a ), [Cu 3 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 Me)} 2 (μ 2 -η 1 :η 2 -CC)) 3 ]­(PF 6 ) 3 ( 7b ), [Cu 2 (μ-Cl) 2 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 R)} 2 (η 2 -CC))] ∞/∞∞ (R = H, 8a ; R = Me, 8b ), [Cu 2 (μ-Br) 2 ({Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 4 Me)} 2 (η 2 -CC))] ( 9 ), and [{Ru­(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )} 3 (η 1 : η 2 -CC))]­[BF 4 ] ( 10 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] We have for some considerable time explored the chemistry associated with the CpRu(CO) 2 moiety because of the conformational flexibility it exhibits, which has allowed the isolation of many interesting complexes. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In the course of preparing [CpRu(CO) 2 Br] using a minor modification of the published procedure 23 (using bromoform rather than CBr 4 ) we discovered that the reaction did not proceed according to our expectations, Scheme 1, giving not only the expected bromide complex but also gave appreciable contamination with hexabromoethane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%