1999
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes.

Abstract: The motivation to form a particular impression of an individual can prompt the inhibition of applicable stereotypes that contradict one's desired impression and the activation and application of stereotypes that support it. Participants, especially those high in prejudice, inhibited the Black stereotype when motivated to esteem a Black individual (because he had praised them). Participants motivated to esteem a Black doctor also activated the doctor stereotype. In contrast, participants motivated to disparage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
261
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
17
261
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both unobtrusive measures of racism -based on either reaction time or motivated reasoning -are significantly related to measures of modern racism (Saucier and Miller 2003;Sinclair and Kunda 1999;Wittenbrink, Judd, and Park 1997). This connection between subtle forms of racial negativity and the new racism lend further support to McConahay's view that new racism reflects broad racial prejudice, not just the narrow expression of racial resentment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Both unobtrusive measures of racism -based on either reaction time or motivated reasoning -are significantly related to measures of modern racism (Saucier and Miller 2003;Sinclair and Kunda 1999;Wittenbrink, Judd, and Park 1997). This connection between subtle forms of racial negativity and the new racism lend further support to McConahay's view that new racism reflects broad racial prejudice, not just the narrow expression of racial resentment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In figure 5, the evidence is exactly balanced, so that the explanatory coherence program ECHO finds the competing hypotheses that Clinton harassed Willey and that he did not do so equally acceptable -they get the same low activation. Further empirical support for emotional coherence is provided by studies of stereotype activation reported by Sinclair and Kunda (1999). They found that participants who were praised by a Black individual tended to inhibit the negative Black stereotype, while participants who were criticized by a Black individual tended to apply the negative stereotype to him and rate him as incompetent.…”
Section: Emotional Coherencementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conditional automaticity effects occur when an automatic process is triggered only in the presence of certain conditions, such as the presence of a specific goal (Bargh 1989;Blair 2002). For example, although exposure to members of minority groups frequently triggers automatic stereotypes of those groups, this automatic stereotype activation depends upon the presence of perceivers' goals, contextual factors, and features of the group members (Blair 2002;Dasgupta and Greenwald 2001;Macrae, Bodenhausen, and Milne 1995;Mitchell, Nosek, and Banaji 2003;Sinclair and Kunda 1999;Spencer et al 1998). Similarly, we suggest that consumers' purchase intentions following fast disclaimers for trust-unknown, not-trusted, and trusted brands derive from a conditionally automatic process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%