1949
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1949.02030050308001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions to an Influenza Virus Vaccine in Infants and Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Live attenuated virus-based vaccines have been the most successful for a number of infectious diseases including polio, yellow fever, measles and smallpox (Plotkin et al, 2008). In regard to influenza, whole virus killed vaccines are associated with adverse reactions, especially in children, and consequently are little used (Quilligan et al, 1949;Salk, 1948). To reduce reactogenicity, most influenza vaccines used today are split-product vaccines or surface-antigen vaccines from chemically inactivated viruses, containing only purified haemagglutinin and neuraminidase, the outer surface proteins of influenza virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live attenuated virus-based vaccines have been the most successful for a number of infectious diseases including polio, yellow fever, measles and smallpox (Plotkin et al, 2008). In regard to influenza, whole virus killed vaccines are associated with adverse reactions, especially in children, and consequently are little used (Quilligan et al, 1949;Salk, 1948). To reduce reactogenicity, most influenza vaccines used today are split-product vaccines or surface-antigen vaccines from chemically inactivated viruses, containing only purified haemagglutinin and neuraminidase, the outer surface proteins of influenza virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivated influenza virus vaccines which contain intact virus particles may produce toxic reactions when inoculated parenterally into man (Salk, 1948;Quilligan, Francis and Minuse, 1949). This adverse toxicity can be abolished by disrupting the virus particles with ether or detergents, but such disrupted virus vaccines contain (in addition to the two surface antigens) internal components of the virus which, it is thought, play no role in the stimulation of neutralizing antibody and are therefore undesirable components of the vaccine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view was arguably influenced to some extent by Andrewes and Charles Stuart-Harris, both of whom served on the United Kingdom's influenza vaccine committee (17). In 1953, when the WHO Expert Committee handed down its report, the United Kingdom's clinical trials program had only completed preliminary studies, and trials to assess the efficacy of influenza vaccines in the United States and other countries were providing mixed findings (18,19). As a result, there was insufficient clinical evidence to support a stronger recommendation on the role that vaccines might play in preventing influenza, and the WHO committee was thereby reluctant to advocate their widespread use.…”
Section: The Emergence and Ascendency Of Biomedicine In Post-war Inflmentioning
confidence: 99%