“…derived from OP nerve agents are less likely to be cleaved at the phospho-serine bond due to steric and electronic effects and are more susceptible to a dealkylation process known as “aging”. ,, Therefore, the differences between the two OP-adduct mechanistic fates are manifested in distinct kinetic processes that are predicated to a large extent on the OP ester substituents of the OP-AChE adduct. Reactivation − may be further distinguished as a spontaneous process in which water acts as a nucleophile (hydrolysis) or more rapidly induced in an oxime-mediated nucleophilic process, both of which lead to scission of the AChE serine O–P bond. ,,, Alternatively, aging is mechanistically aligned with a putative cationic process (protonation) leading to scission at an alkyl-oxygen bond affording a toxicologically deleterious AChE-phosphoanion (AChE-OP(O)(R)(O – ) species that is recalcitrant to reactivate even with oximes. ,,,,, As a result, branched phosphoesters such as iPrO- and OCH(CH 3 )C(CH 3 ) 3 that can better stabilize cations in the transition state favor aging and proceed via a path alternate to reactivation. Clearly, reactivation and aging mechanisms are competing postinhibitory processes whose rates and outcomes are influenced by substituents with opposing electronic properties.…”