1994
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450720114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivation of partially‐sulphated limestone particles from a cfb combustor by hydration

Abstract: Spent limestone samples from the bed and baghouse of a 22 MWe circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler were hydrated and then sulphated in a thermogravimetric analyzer under conditions similar to those found in CFB combustors (850°C, 0.3% SO2, 9% O2, 9% CO2 and 81.7% N2). Hydration using water gave faster rates and higher levels of conversion of the residual CaO to Ca (OH)2 than immersion in pure steam at 150 and 200°C. The particles expanded during hydration and their internal volume increased from 0.1 cm3/g Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, for the limestone at hand the final conversion degree after resulfation was approximately twice that obtained after the first sulfation, independently of the particle size range. When the effectiveness of sorbent reactivation achieved in the present work is compared with previously published results, 5,7 it must be borne in mind that hydration was accomplished in a large excess water. Moreover, overnight drying at ambient conditions following the 60 min hydration extended the time during which the sorbent was in contact with water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, for the limestone at hand the final conversion degree after resulfation was approximately twice that obtained after the first sulfation, independently of the particle size range. When the effectiveness of sorbent reactivation achieved in the present work is compared with previously published results, 5,7 it must be borne in mind that hydration was accomplished in a large excess water. Moreover, overnight drying at ambient conditions following the 60 min hydration extended the time during which the sorbent was in contact with water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the second of these reactions is slow and can be ignored from the point of view of sorbent reactivation (Couturier et al, 1994;Anthony et al, 1997). During hydration of the partially-sulphated material, water permeates the outer CaSO 4 layer of the sorbent particles and reacts with CaO in the core.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the reaction product, Ca(OH) 2 , has a larger molar volume than the CaO (33 versus 17 mL/mol), the core swells, leading to cracking of the sulphated shell. When the reactivated sorbent particles are re-injected into the fluidized bed, the Ca(OH) 2 in these particles decomposes and the previously inaccessible CaO becomes available for further sulphation (Couturier et al, 1994;Laursen et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be inferred from the cosphere overlap model , that there are four interactions between maltitol and glycylglycine molecules: (1) the ion–hydrophilic interaction between the ionic groups (NH 3 + , NH 2 + , and COO – ) of glycylglycine and the hydrophilic group (OH – ) of maltitol; (2) the ion–hydrophobic interaction between the ionic group of glycylglycine and the alkyl chain of maltitol; (3) the hydrophobic–hydrophilic interaction between the alkyl chain of glycylglycine and the hydrophilic group of maltitol; and (4) the hydrophobic–hydrophobic interaction between the alkyl chain of glycylglycine and the alkyl chain of maltitol. Among these interactions, the ion–hydrophilic interaction produces positive contribution to the volume, while the ion–hydrophobic, hydrophobic–hydrophilic, and hydrophobic–hydrophobic interactions cause negative contribution to Δ tr V φ 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%