Reactive and Proactive Adaptation of Cognitive and Motor Neural Signals during Performance of a Stop-Change Task

Brockett, Adam T.; Roesch, Matthew R.

doi:10.3390/brainsci11050617

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 163 publications

(268 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, behavioral differences and specific brain activity alterations could potentially be used as a biomarker of schizophrenia diathesis. Finally, in a very detailed and rich review, Brockett and Roesch [24] described the role of the rat brain regions in reactive and proactive inhibitory control. Although the authors mainly focused on single-unit and lesion data collected in their laboratory, they constantly draw parallels with data obtained in non-human primates and humans.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond Reactive Inhibition: Unpacking the Multifaceted Nature of Motor Inhibition

Mirabella

2023

Brain Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond Reactive Inhibition: Unpacking the Multifaceted Nature of Motor Inhibition

Mirabella

2023

Brain Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Stimuli of either appetitive or aversive valence can drive attention in a way that subsequently facilitates decision-making and learning. We have found that attention-related signals in ACC can be driven by unsigned prediction errors when there are unexpected changes in outcome valence or cues that signal the need to change behavior ( Bryden et al, 2011 , 2019 ; Brockett et al, 2020 ; Brockett and Roesch, 2021 ).…”

Section: Anterior Cingulate Cortex’s Contribution To Reward Cognitive...mentioning

confidence: 96%

Neural signals implicated in the processing of appetitive and aversive events in social and non-social contexts

Vázquez

Schneider²,

Roesch³

2022

Front. Syst. Neurosci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2014, we participated in a special issue of Frontiers examining the neural processing of appetitive and aversive events. Specifically, we reviewed brain areas that contribute to the encoding of prediction errors and value versus salience, attention and motivation. Further, we described how we disambiguated these cognitive processes and their neural substrates by using paradigms that incorporate both appetitive and aversive stimuli. We described a circuit in which the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) signals expected value and the basolateral amygdala (BLA) encodes the salience and valence of both appetitive and aversive events. This information is integrated by the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and dopaminergic (DA) signaling in order to generate prediction and prediction error signals, which guide decision-making and learning via the dorsal striatum (DS). Lastly, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is monitoring actions and outcomes, and signals the need to engage attentional control in order to optimize behavioral output. Here, we expand upon this framework, and review our recent work in which within-task manipulations of both appetitive and aversive stimuli allow us to uncover the neural processes that contribute to the detection of outcomes delivered to a conspecific and behaviors in social contexts. Specifically, we discuss the involvement of single-unit firing in the ACC and DA signals in the NAc during the processing of appetitive and aversive events in both social and non-social contexts.

show abstract

“…When it comes to adaptive motor control, most studies have focused on proactive or reactive inhibitory control 29 . Proactive control is when adjustments in the motor command are foreseen ahead of time, while reactive control is when the motor command must be adjusted in the moment 30 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adults with cerebral palsy exhibit uncharacteristic cortical oscillations during an adaptive sensorimotor control task

Hinton,

Busboom,

Embury

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research has shown that the sensorimotor cortical oscillations are uncharacteristic in persons with cerebral palsy (CP); however, it is unknown if these altered cortical oscillations have an impact on adaptive sensorimotor control. This investigation evaluated the cortical dynamics when the motor action needs to be changed “on-the-fly”. Adults with CP and neurotypical controls completed a sensorimotor task that required either proactive or reactive control while undergoing magnetoencephalography (MEG). When compared with the controls, the adults with CP had a weaker beta (18–24 Hz) event-related desynchronization (ERD), post-movement beta rebound (PMBR, 16–20 Hz) and theta (4–6 Hz) event-related synchronization (ERS) in the sensorimotor cortices. In agreement with normative work, the controls exhibited differences in the strength of the sensorimotor gamma (66–84 Hz) ERS during proactive compared to reactive trials, but similar condition-wise changes were not seen in adults with CP. Lastly, the adults with CP who had a stronger theta ERS tended to have better hand dexterity, as indicated by the Box and Blocks Test and Purdue Pegboard Test. These results may suggest that alterations in the theta and gamma cortical oscillations play a role in the altered hand dexterity and uncharacteristic adaptive sensorimotor control noted in adults with CP.

show abstract

Reactive and Proactive Adaptation of Cognitive and Motor Neural Signals during Performance of a Stop-Change Task

Cited by 5 publications

References 163 publications

Beyond Reactive Inhibition: Unpacking the Multifaceted Nature of Motor Inhibition

Beyond Reactive Inhibition: Unpacking the Multifaceted Nature of Motor Inhibition

Neural signals implicated in the processing of appetitive and aversive events in social and non-social contexts

Adults with cerebral palsy exhibit uncharacteristic cortical oscillations during an adaptive sensorimotor control task

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About