1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02811687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive element-sulfur interaction and oxide scale adherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The casting stock was melted by Ross & Catherall in Sheffield, UK to industry-leading standards. Chemical analysis indicated less than 7.2 ppmw of sulphur in the stock, so that -since the oxidation temperatures used here are 1000ºC or lower and the tests carried out isothermally -any influence of this element on oxidation performance will be negligible [9][10][11]. Casting was carried out under the vacuum of better than 10 -4 Pa.…”
Section: Mould Preparation and Castingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The casting stock was melted by Ross & Catherall in Sheffield, UK to industry-leading standards. Chemical analysis indicated less than 7.2 ppmw of sulphur in the stock, so that -since the oxidation temperatures used here are 1000ºC or lower and the tests carried out isothermally -any influence of this element on oxidation performance will be negligible [9][10][11]. Casting was carried out under the vacuum of better than 10 -4 Pa.…”
Section: Mould Preparation and Castingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segregation of indigenous sulfur impurity from an alloy to the Ah03 scale/alloy interface during high temperature oxidation is often considered the major cause that weakens the interface [1][2][3][4]' Systematic studies of the chemical changes at Ah03/alloy interfaces as a function of oxidation time have in recent years been carried out for FeCrAI [5], Fe3AI and FeAI [6,7], where the alloys normally contain about 20 ppm of sulfur. Although sulfur was found to be the major segregant at these scale/alloy interfaces, the segregation behavior, in terms of rate and amount, varied significantly with different alloys and differed from surface segregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Dispersed Y203 also suppresses the spalling by adsorbing S at the interface between Y203 particle and matrix. (4) This S effect model can be applied to the spalling of oxide scale formed in high temperature oxidation, although sometimesperturbed. (5) The interfacial segregation of P is not detrimental to the adherence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%