“…Presently, there is an acceptable consensus among the experimental data available in the literature on the R1 reaction thermal rate constant. ,− Specifically, the rate constant approximation proposed by Fernandez et al, elaborated initially for the temperature interval T = 400–1220 K [ k ( T ) = 1.20 × 10 6 T 2.15 exp(−2557/ T ) cm 3 mol –1 s –1 ], in fact, , is in good consistency with the other measurements in a much wider temperature range. ,,− However, there are still problems with the quantitative interpretation of these data. Particularly, some theoretical studies ,− ,, using the precise potential energy surfaces (PESs) and advanced methods for calculating the thermal rate constants, such as the quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) approach and even wave packet (WP) dynamics, markedly (by more than an order of magnitude) underestimated the low-temperature measurements. − , Only just recently, Esposito and Armenise have succeeded in QCT simulations in obtaining the R1 thermal rate constant, which is consistent with experimental data over a wide temperature range.…”